ABSTRACT
COMPUTER FORENSICS METHODOLOGIES
This paper discusses four aspects of computer forensic methodologies that are popular to investigations and data discovery. Computer forensics has become increasingly important with growth in computer intrusions, crimes, and data breaches that are widely reported. A computer forensics investigation reveals information and footprints of those that have accessed, or attempted to access, information they were originally not given permission to have, information indicative of a criminal act, or to follow audit trails of a user’s activities.
With the increasing use of electronic devices for correspondence, file sharing, communication, and financial transactions, forensic investigation of computer activities is of increasing significance. This paper observes popular methodologies for computer forensics and examines their practical application in the field with stories of success and failure and specifies the advantages and disadvantages of examined methodologies.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Start on new page
I. INTRODUCTION
II. LITERATURE
Computer Forensics Methodologies
Computer Forensics and Security Policies
Data Preservation, Recovery and Examination
Software Tools
III. METHODOLOGY
Data Collection Technique
Subjects and Setting
Statistical Analysis
Limitations of the Study
IV. RESULTS
Case Studies
-Successful Intrusions
-Forensics of Removable Media
-Forensic Analysis of Mobile Telephones
-Cyber Espionage
-Anti-Forensics
Preventative Measures
V. DISCUSSION
Summary
Recommendations
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. what goes here & Dumais, S. (2006). Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval: University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; SIGIR [Seattle:2006] August 6 – 11, 2006. New York, NY: ACM Press.
2. Casey, E. (2004). Digital evidence and computer crime forensic science, computers and the Internet (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
3. Casey, E. (2010). Handbook of digital forensics and investigation. London: Academic.
4. Coderre, D. (2009). Internal audit: Efficiency through automation. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Doyle, L., & Becker, J. (1975). Information retrieval and processing. Los Angeles: Melville Pub.
6. Gallegos, F. (2004). Information technology control and audit (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Fla.: Auerbach Publications.
7. Goodman, R., & Lawless, M. (1994). Technology and strategy: Conceptual models and diagnostics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Korfhage, R. (1997). Information storage and retrieval. New York: Wiley Computer Pub.
9. Kruse, W., & Heiser, J. (2001). Computer forensics: Incident response essentials. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Philipp, A., & Cowen, D. (2010). Hacking exposed computer forensics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Osborne.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
jQuery(document).ready(function($) { var currentPage = 1; // Initialize current page
function reloadLatestPosts() { // Perform AJAX request $.ajax({ url: lpr_ajax.ajax_url, type: 'post', data: { action: 'lpr_get_latest_posts', paged: currentPage // Send current page number to server }, success: function(response) { // Clear existing content of the container $('#lpr-posts-container').empty();
// Append new posts and fade in $('#lpr-posts-container').append(response).hide().fadeIn('slow');
// Increment current page for next pagination currentPage++; }, error: function(xhr, status, error) { console.error('AJAX request error:', error); } }); }
// Initially load latest posts reloadLatestPosts();
// Example of subsequent reloads setInterval(function() { reloadLatestPosts(); }, 7000); // Reload every 7 seconds });

