Assignment 3 – due Wednesday of Week 11 (750-1000 words)
Answer ONE of the following three questions.
Analyze either Case 6.2 “Freedom to Fire” or Case 6.3 “Speaking Out About Malt.”In your answer deal with some of the discussion questions listed at the end of the case, plus any other issues that seem important. (Unit 9)
Analyze “Case Study: Confronting Harassment” by John Hasnas in terms of the following questions. A good answer will attend to the relevant details of the case.
To what extent is the behavior and viewpoint of Dominique Francon justifiable? To what extent is the behaviour and viewpoint of Ellsworth Toohey defensible?
What alternatives are now open to Howard Roark? What considerations are relevant to his decision? What should he do?
Suppose that Dominique does file suit against Toohey and the magazine, and you are her attorney? Based on the facts about U.S. sexual harassment law in the article by Bravo and Cassedy, how would you argue her case? Suppose you are the defence attorney for Toohey and the magazine? How would you argue their case? Which side is strongest? (Unit 10)
Imagine that you have been asked to examine the material in “Combating Drugs inthe Workplace” and develop a substance abuse policy for your workplace. Specify the workplace you are dealing with. Outline your policy, making sure to balance the need to prevent substance abuse with respect for employee privacy and freedom. Show how your policy would deal with at least 4 cases discussed in the article. (Unit 10)
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|