1) Read My Post (my post doc. File)
2) Please provide a discussion post to the following work. You need to challenge the position of the work below pertaining to “my post”.
3)Use U.S sources only
The following assignment is to challenge the following:
“Case:
Doe v. Norwalk Community College, 2007 WL 2066497 (D. Conn. July 16, 2007)
A college and one of its professors were once sued in regard to an alleged sexually assault by the professor against a student.
Federal law required that the college preserve the hard drive and emails and all electronic communications related to a possible court trial. This is called “litigation hold” and the college was found to have violated the federal rule in question.
I cannot state that the court decision is consistent with the “evidence as presented,” because this is a case of evidence NOT presented.
The forensic expert(s) proved that selective deletion was performed regarding material related to “Masi” (the last name of the accused):
“However, even if such a showing were necessary, the court found that Doe had satisfied it by offering evidence regarding one deleted email and a missing computer file the title of which referenced Masi. ” (Electronic Discover Law Blog, 2007)
decision was consistent with the forensic team’s conclusion that the hard drive was wiped out and that emails were deleted. In one of the paragraphs of the summary above, we learn that ”
WORKS CITED:
Rule 37(f) Safe Harbor Provision Requires a Routine System in Place and Some Affirmative Action by Party to Prevent System from Destroying or Altering Information | Electronic Discovery Law Blog. (2007, August 1). Retrieved July 12, 2015. “
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|