Describe and relate the implementation solution to CIA and incorporate, people, processes and technology to this plan.

Using the recommendation memo and network diagram, develop a high-level plan for implementing the changes and mitigating vulnerabilities and convergence issues. The high-level plan should include all the system development life cycle (SDLC) gates/decision points and all relevant tasks. Describe and relate the implementation solution to CIA and incorporate, people, processes and technology to this plan.

This is a combination of a paper and a detailed list of steps and resources that you would follow to implement and complete this project. Think about all of the actions, resources, and tasks that you would need in order to effect a successful implementation. These should also be included as part of the plan. The instructor may provide a template to use with this assignment. The minimum structure for this assignment is below:

INTRODUCTION
Purpose of Plan
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Business Goals and Objectives
Project Goals and Objectives
SCOPE
Scope Definition
Items Beyond Scope
PROJECTED EXPENSES
System Development Life Cycle/Schedule
Milestones
ASSUMPTIONS
Project Assumptions
CONSTRAINTS
Project Constraints
Critical Project Barriers

The Plan will be a minimum 5 page, double-spaced paper using Times New Roman 12 font and APA style formatting for citations and references. It will also include a minimum of 5 references. The Title/Cover page, illustrations (tables/charts/graphs), network diagram, and references are not part of the page count but are required for the assignment. The grading rubric provides additional details as to what should be included in the paper. Your instructor may provide an APA style template to use for this paper.

*** Make sure that you include in detail the steps you would take to secure the project.

Purpose / Goals and Objectives 10 points

Expertly defines goals and objectives
8 points

identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort
6 points

identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a basic understanding of overall effort
3 points

identifies goals and objectives in a manner where some aspects are missing or incomplete.
0 points

does not identify goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort.
Scope of Security Issues 10 points

Clearly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies material and document relationships.
8 points

Basically describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies some material and document relationships.
6 points

Weakly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Some synthesizing and application or applies material and document relationships.
3 points

Little description and relating information security and other technology issues. Little synthesizing or application of material and document relationships.
0 points

No description or relationship of information security or other technology issues. Doesn’t synthesize or apply material and document relationships.
Project Expenses Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Costs Related to Security Effort/Solution 5 points

Clearly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
4 points

Basically identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
2 points

Weakly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
1 point

Little identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. May not link any costs to technologies identified.
0 points

No identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. No link of any costs to technologies identified.
SDLC Schedule 10 points

Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
8 points

Basically Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
6 points

Weakly Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
3 points

Little synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
0 points

No synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
Solution Diagram and Illustration Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Use of Network diagram and illustrations 10 points

Network diagram and accompanying illustration are strongly linked to proposed solution and content
8 points

Network diagram and accompanying illustration are generally linked to proposed solution and content
6 points

Network diagram and accompanying illustration are weakly linked to proposed solution and content
3 points

Network diagram and accompanying illustration are haphazardly linked to proposed solution and content
0 points

Network diagram and accompanying illustration are not linked to proposed solution and content
Security Strategy Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Milestones 5 points

Each defined milestone is directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
4 points

Most milestones are related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
2 points

Milestones are weakly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
1 point

Milestone are haphazardly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
1 point

No milestones are directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
Assumptions 10 points

Clearly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers all three requirements.
8 points

Basically identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least two of the three requirements.
6 points

Weakly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least one of the requirements.
3 points

Little identification of security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. May not cover one of the requirements.
0 points

Doesn’t identify security solutions or assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. Doesn’t cover any of the three requirements.
Constraints 5 points

Clearly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
4 points

Basically describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
2 points

Weakly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
1 point

Little description of the linkage and constraints associated with solution
0 points

No description of any linkage or constraints associated with solution
Timeline Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
SDLC Tasks 5 points

Clear and detailed SDLC tasks that logically leads to the proposed solutions
4 points

Basic SDLC tasks are provided that generally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
2 points

Weak and poorly detailed SDLC tasks are provided that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
1 point

Haphazard and poorly detailed SDLC tasks that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
0 points

No SDLC tasks are provided that lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized

No clear and defined tasks for each solution.
Prioritize Tasks 5 points

Major tasks are clearly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
4 points

Major tasks basically prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
2 points

Major tasks weakly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
1 point

Few tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
0 points

No tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
Define Resources 5 points

Clearly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
4 points

Basically defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
2 points

Weakly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
1 point

Little defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
0 points

No defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
Finds and Applies Knowledge Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Use of Authoritative Sources 5 points

Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No APA style errors in sources.
4 points

Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.
3 points

Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.
1 point

May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May not have used APA style formatting.
0 points

No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper.
Citation of Sources 5 points

All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.
4 points

All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.
2 points

All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.
1 point

All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
0 points

No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
Organization, Execution and Appearance Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Formatting 5 points

Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
4 points

MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct cover sheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
2 points

MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct cover sheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
1 point

MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
0 points

Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
Grammar and Punctuation 5 points

No grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
4 points

Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
2 points

Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
1 point

Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
0 points

More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Overall Score Level 5

4 or more Level 4

3 or more Level 3

2 or more Level 2

1 or mo

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered