Adams, J. E. (1986). How to help people change. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.
Backus, W.D., & Chapian, M. (2000). Telling yourself the truth (20th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers.
THEORY CRIT1QUE GRADING RUBRIC
The following represents an additive template for grading. Instead of beginning with 100 and losing points for errors, you begin with a 0 and earn points for your work in determining your grade. Each Theory Critique (TC) will be evaluated on the following four foundational elements.
1. Concise Summary of the Content Value: 50 Points
-Demonstrates a solid understanding of the material presented
-Adequately synthesizes the whole of the text in a concise manner
-Presents an organized interaction that specifically addresses the assignment with clarity and coherency
2. Evaluation of the Strengths and Weaknesses Value: 25 Points
– Provides clear, insightful, rich interaction with subject matter
-Integrates material from the course lectures and assigned reading
-Demonstrates critical thinking in the analysis and critique of the material
3. Personal Reflection and Application Value: 15 Points
-Personal example(s) offered which sufficiently relate to the content of the text
-Clear connections are made between the life episode and the reading
-Conclusions drawn reveal thoughtful summarization and personal application
4. Formatting / Academic Writing Style Value: 10 Points
-Assignment includes a Title Page
-Written in an organized manner, includes headings for each major section
-Typographically and grammatically correct (including sentence structure)
-Margins, paragraph indentions, and font size/style are correct
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|