There is an appeal to the High Court: discuss the law in relation to the assessment of probative value under the Uniform Evidence Act with reference to the two opposing views from NSW and Victoria – R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228, and Dupas v The Queen [2012] VSCA 328.
You may write it like a judgment, or as if you are one of the parties arguing for the NSW or Victorian position.
Words:
2500 to 3000. DO NOT exceed the word limit, as the usual penalties will apply.The word limit does not include footnotes (unless footnotes contain information which,in the opinion of the marker, should be in the body of the assignment). The word limit also does not include a bibliography. A bibliography is not required, but may be included.
Presentation:
As per Australian Guide to Legal Citation 3rd edition
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
jQuery(document).ready(function($) { var currentPage = 1; // Initialize current page
function reloadLatestPosts() { // Perform AJAX request $.ajax({ url: lpr_ajax.ajax_url, type: 'post', data: { action: 'lpr_get_latest_posts', paged: currentPage // Send current page number to server }, success: function(response) { // Clear existing content of the container $('#lpr-posts-container').empty();
// Append new posts and fade in $('#lpr-posts-container').append(response).hide().fadeIn('slow');
// Increment current page for next pagination currentPage++; }, error: function(xhr, status, error) { console.error('AJAX request error:', error); } }); }
// Initially load latest posts reloadLatestPosts();
// Example of subsequent reloads setInterval(function() { reloadLatestPosts(); }, 7000); // Reload every 7 seconds });

