Select a single philosophical question to explore. Provide and explain your personal reflection on the question using cited examples from the course to support your answer.

Assignment Question

DIRECTIONS: As reported in Plato’s account The Apology, Socrates famously claimed at his trial that “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this course, you have had the opportunity to examine your own life and reality through the thoughts of the ancient Greek philosophers. The purpose of this Touchstone assignment is for you (1) to engage with the philosophical ideas presented in this course and (2) to reflect on how these philosophical ideas have impacted your own life.

Part I: Philosophical Thinking In the first part of the Touchstone, you will be distinguishing between the three primary branches of philosophy. Consider the three following questions: What is knowledge? What is reality made of? What is the good life and how ought I to live it? These are the basic questions that were considered in different forms by the major figures in ancient Greek philosophy. But they are also critical questions for our own lives today, whether we are philosophers or not. Part I of this assignment should be approximately 1-2 pages (300-600 words) and cover each of the following steps: First, you should define philosophy and then distinguish and define each of the three main branches of philosophy covered in this class. Then, identify which of the above questions is associated with each branch of philosophy. You should illustrate the differences between the three branches of philosophy using examples from the course. For example, explain how Socrates would answer the question “What is knowledge?” or how Epictetus would answer the question “What is the good life?” You will use information and examples from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the lesson and use the following format: In-text citation: (Aristotle’s Highest Good, n.d.) or (The Footnotes to Plato, n.d.).

Part II: Reflection For the second part of the Touchstone, now that you’ve distinguished between the three main branches of philosophy, you will focus on one of those three questions from Part I and use that as a starting point and guide for your personal philosophical reflection. The purpose of Part II is for you to reflect on the philosophical mindset and some of the ideas presented in this course and apply them to your own life. This reflection is more open-ended than Part I, but should include reflections on the following questions: What does it mean to think philosophically? How can thinking philosophically help me in my own life? What impact do the ideas of the ancient Greek philosophers have on my own views and opinions? Then, based on these reflections, you should give your own answer to whichever of the three questions from Part I you chose to focus on, using cited examples from the course to support your answer. (“What is knowledge?”; “What is reality?”; “What is the good life?”)

Part II of this assignment should be approximately 1-2 pages (300-600 words). You should write at least one paragraph for each of the three prompts listed above. In answering these reflection questions, you are free to draw from your own experiences as well as bringing in the ideas of different ancient Greek philosophers. note: Some philosophers will be more suited for particular questions than others. For example, Epictetus has a lot to say about “What is the good life and how ought I to live it?” while not saying much about knowledge or reality. Plato and Aristotle wrote a great deal about all three questions. B. Completion Guidelines Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

Connections (5 points) Connect each of the philosophical questions with the associated branch of philosophy as defined in the course. Clearly and correctly connects each of the philosophical questions with the associated branch of philosophy as defined in the course. Clearly and correctly connects each of the philosophical questions with the associated branch of philosophy as defined in the course, except for one of the above. Clearly and correctly connects each of the philosophical questions with the associated branch of philosophy as defined in the course, except for two of the above. Does not connect each of the philosophical questions with the associated branch of philosophy as defined in the course.

Examples (20 points) Illustrate the differences between the three branches of philosophy, using cited examples from the course. Clearly illustrates each of the three branches of philosophy, using cited examples from the course. Clearly illustrates at least two of the three branches of philosophy, using cited examples from the course. Clearly illustrates at least one of the three branches of philosophy, using cited examples from the course. Does not illustrate the differences between the three branches of philosophy, using cited examples from the course.

Philosophical Thinking (5 points) Describe philosophical thinking and reflect on how it can help in a personal way. Clearly and accurately describes philosophical thinking. Offers an example of how it helps in a personal way. For the most part, clearly and accurately describes philosophical thinking, and offers an example of how it helps in a personal way. Inaccurately or unclearly describes philosophical thinking, or does not offer an example of how it helps in a personal way. Does not describe philosophical thinking and reflect on how it can help in a personal way.

Impact (10 points) Describe the influence of philosophical viewpoints from the course on personal views and opinions. Clearly identifies and describes a significant influence of philosophical viewpoints from the course on personal views and opinions. Engagement with course material is evident. Identifies and describes the influence of philosophical viewpoints from the course on personal views and opinions. Engagement with course material is less evident. Identifies and poorly describes the influence of philosophical viewpoints from the course on personal views and opinions. Engagement with course material is largely absent. Does not describe the influence of philosophical viewpoints from the course on personal views and opinions.

Reflection (25 points) Select a single philosophical question to explore. Provide and explain your personal reflection on the question using cited examples from the course to support your answer. Clearly selects a single philosophical question to explore. Provides a personal answer to the question and fully explains their thinking with several additional details. Engagement with course material is evident. Clearly selects a single philosophical question to explore. Provides a personal answer to the question and partially explains their thinking with a few additional details. Engagement with course material is less evident. Does not clearly select a single philosophical question to explore. Provides an unclear personal answer to the question or does not explain their thinking with any details. Engagement with course material is largely absent. Does not select a single philosophical question to explore. Does not provide and explain your personal reflection on the question. D. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Your draft must be 3-4 page (approximately 700-1000 words) Double-space your submission and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.