Write a paper analyzing the critical incident at CapraTek.

Write a 5-6 page paper analyzing the critical incident at CapraTek. As a result of the chart and memorandum you created for your consulting client, legal counsel for CapraTek has determined that the company experienced a critical incident related to operating during a pandemic environment that has resulted in serious legal risks. The critical incident includes a potential failure to implement appropriate precautions in the workplace and a potential failure to properly select essential workers to remain onsite during the pandemic. The company has hired an outside investigator to interview five key CapraTek employees regarding this incident. The CEO has now asked you to analyze the interviews of these employees and write a memorandum in narrative form addressing the six deaths reported in the wrongful death worker complaints. In this assessment, you will analyze the transcriipt of interviews with five key CapraTek employees and write a memorandum in narrative form addressing the following for each of the wrongful death complaints. See the CapraTek Key Employee Interviews [DOCX] Download CapraTek Key Employee Interviews [DOCX]. Identify actions, errors, and omissions that may have contributed to the six wrongful death complaints; assign each action, error, or omission to the individual(s) involved. Analyze potential legal liabilities to the company resulting from the incident supported by references to the legislation, order, or recommendation involved. Refer to the specific U.S. law, regulation, recommendation, or order involved. Assess the severity of the legal risk for each complaint. Include a summary of the plaintiff’s case and potential defenses against each claim. Address the severity of potential legal liability. Summarize the plaintiff’s potential case. Describe any defenses CapraTek might be able to assert to avoid liability. Evaluate the skills of the interviewer, including their selection of key employees interviewed, facts gathered, and the thoroughness of interview questions. Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Memorandum should be concise, well organized, and written in narrative form, Adhere to conventions for spelling, grammar, sentence structure, legal/business terminology, and word usage. Adhere to APA citation and referencing standards. As you complete your assessment, be sure it meets the following guidelines: Written communication: Use error-free doctoral-level writing, with original (non-plagiarized) content, logical phrasing, and accurate word choices. Scholarship: Use 3–4 professionally reputable sources to support your main points and analysis. Be sure to include scholarly sources. Course readings may be included among the required sources. APA formatting: All resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Length: 5–6 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the cover page, illustrations, reference page, and appendix. Font and font size: Consistent, APA-compliant font, 12-point. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Create rule- and value-based arguments from human resource models and theories, supported with clear and relevant evidence that convey professional tone and style. Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Competency 4: Appraise multiple responses to a managing a human resource problem for compliance within ethical, legal, or regulatory frameworks. Assess the severity of the legal risk for each complaint, including a summary of the plaintiff’s case, and potential defenses against each claim. Competency 5: Analyze an organization’s human resource management problem from the perspective of the legal and regulatory environment in which the organization operates. Identify actions, errors, and omissions that may have contributed to the six wrongful death complaints; assign each action, error, or omission to the individual(s) involved. Analyze potential legal liabilities to the company resulting from the incident supported by references to the legislation, order, or recommendation involved. Evaluate the skills of the interviewer including their selection of key employees interviewed, facts gathered, and the thoroughness of interview questions. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Create rule- and value-based arguments from human resource models and theories, supported with clear and relevant evidence that convey professional tone and style. Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Competency 4: Appraise multiple responses to a managing a human resource problem for compliance within ethical, legal, or regulatory frameworks. Assess the severity of the legal risk for each complaint, including a summary of the plaintiff’s case, and potential defenses against each claim. Competency 5: Analyze an organization’s human resource management problem from the perspective of the legal and regulatory environment in which the organization operates. Identify actions, errors, and omissions that may have contributed to the six wrongful death complaints; assign each action, error, or omission to the individual(s) involved. Analyze potential legal liabilities to the company resulting from the incident supported by references to the legislation, order, or recommendation involved. Evaluate the skills of the interviewer including their selection of key employees interviewed, facts gathered, and the thoroughness of interview questions.