Write just two paragraphs on either Applbaum's argument for the moral permissibility of racial profiling or Hellman's argument against such profiling.

For this short paper, you will write just two paragraphs on either Applbaum’s argument for the moral permissibility of racial profiling or Hellman’s argument against such profiling. NOTE: you will not be writing directly on racial profiling; the topic of the paper is one of the two arguments.

In the first paragraph, explain an objection (just one) you have to the given argument. Of course, you will need to make it clear which argument you are writing about.
In the second paragraph, explain and deal with (respond to) what you think someone who does not agree with what you wrote in the first paragraph would say, whether that is the original author or not. In this case, you should not agree with the response to your objection. If you think it is a good enough response to your objection you need to come up with another objection.

So, to be extra-clear, your paper should include three things:

A) An objection to either Applbaum’s or Hellman’s argument.

B) A potential response to that argument, from the position of someone who does not agree with (A).

C) A rebuttal to (B), supporting (A). (Basically, “This is why (B) is not a good enough response to my objection (A).”)

You will be graded on the strength and quality of your objection, the clarity and quality of your thinking and explanations, and, of course, your writing.

Do not use ANY outside sources, where an outside source is anything other than the papers in our book by Applbaum and Hellman.