Q- After reading Sheri Fink’s story of the Katrina disaster, it is easy to identify all the ways “the system” failed. Everything from personnel issues, structural failures, political battles and ethical compromises were evident throughout the article. Your assignment for this week is to identify the ethical compromises that took place during this crisis. Using the guidelines from the syllabus, address the following questions: 1. Before the body of your response, write an abstract of the article–if you don’t know how to do this, the APA manual can help. 2, What was the single most compelling ethical conflict (in your opinion) that happened during Katrinia that was described in the article? [There were many ethical conflicts, only address ONE). Be sure to include names within the article/health care roles and specifics (patients, situation)of the ethical failure. What failed, why? how? when? Identify various perspectives of the ethical conflict (pros and cons). 3. How could the ethical conflict that you identified have been prevented? Offer your perspective from an advanced nursing perspective. It is only necessary to write about ONE ethical situation but there needs to be details, critical analysis and thoughtful reflection. Remember, no first person! Your posting should be in APA format, and attached as a file document (.doc, .docx)–no PDF!
By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
Consider those points in your paper
• comprehensive scholarly reflection of approximately 800-1200 words incorporating relevant responses to the topic/discussion question. Full credit is given for on time, citation appropriate, comprehensive posting without errors of grammar, spelling, etc. Responses reflect graduate level effort in both writing skills and critical analysis. (9-10 points). Further point deductions for grammar or sentence structure regardless of the extensiveness of the submission.
• Limited on time posting (800-1000 words) and/or with errors of grammar, etc and/or failing to adequately address the discussion issue. Critical thinking is partially evident, reflecting graduate level effort (6-8 points).
• Brief (< 500 words) with minimal evidence of critical thought, significant errors of grammar, etc. (4-5 points)
• Random posting of any length lacking clear evidence of the directions associated with the assignment and/or
significant errors of syntax, grammar or professional writing. (2-3 points)
• APA formatting including title page, font, margins, citations, etc is expected without error.
• Further point deduction for late submission or recurrent APA errors.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|