Sales Management

Sales Management

Sales management primarily deals with the workforce in various elements with the most prominent being the selection and hiring processes. Various programs have been adopted within the work setting to enhance the sales element through training conferences and various incentives towards enhancing returns in commercial institutions[1]. Nevertheless, even with this forms of inducements the sales element has been considered as ineffectual primarily due to the hiring of wrong individuals within the job or the placement of potential sales individuals within the wrong product lines. In actuality, it is believed that within all working institutions that only a meager twenty percent of the sales team achieves the organization’s sales needs[2]. Additionally, twenty-five percent from the remaining eighty percent comprises of individuals with sales capacities yet working within the wrong product lines. The inefficiency noted by the given statistics mandate changes within the work places as it leads to superior performances.

Managers bear a deterministic aspect in the creation of a good sales team as a prerequisite to healthy job delivery. The recruitment and hiring element is important in all trading institutions. This is because, first, companies allocate colossal finances, efforts and durations within the selection requirement[3]. This overlay comprises of expenditures primarily within the selection phase and later within the training, progression and inspiration needs to the sales force for enhanced performances. As noted within the latter quarter of the twentieth century, individual selection outlays were averaging to twenty-four thousand pounds within an annual duration[4]. Within the start of the twenty-first century, the costs had risen significantly to at least forty thousand pounds for each sales worker. This is attributed to the adoption of globalization practices that have modified the working settings into being more competitive and thereby mandating superior sales forces as a defense against the other commercial rivals[5].

Secondly, hiring errors tend to be very expensive to an organization both tangibly as noted by the resources wasted and indirectly though the market losses attributable to poor consumer handling and withholding capability[6]. Shareholders offer monetary assistance within organization as ventures towards wealth creation and thereby the need for profit optimization. This is easily attained though effectual sales teams and the lessening of cost structures through the removal of inefficiencies. Hiring unqualified salespersons infuses an adverse element towards both approaches and thus leading to the lessening of probable and present investments. Within the extreme level, the organization tends to have low capital bases required for business handling and management and therefore possible closures[7]. The whole workforce would then be rendered as unemployed creating a colossal effect within the whole organization. The shareholder and other stakeholders would also be adversely impacted by the situation. This therefore reveals the magnitude of acquiring a good sales team within an organization as success would lead to trading extensions and sustainability.

The inverse of the preceding premise holds true as defined by the relation that wrong salespersons are a liability within the workplace. The first problem related to hiring of wrong salespersons is that ineffectual sales servicing leads to low area covers that subsequently limit the individuals served and thus the market reached within a given instance[8]. This leads to market redundancy by the fact that it inhibits extensions and therefore constituting to a loss for the organization. Additionally, the ineffectuality also leads to poor consumer monitoring and follow-up and this has a significant element on company progression and consumer retention. The present business setting employs the customer-centric technique that accords focus on the consumers as the deterministic forces within an industry[9]. By centering on the consumers needs, trading centers have noted that the production process becomes less expensive and therefore becomes rewarding to the company as noted through the profit element.

Individuals selected for sales work but lacking the required skills and drive tend to have poor associations with the consumers and therefore inhibiting proper handling, monitoring and follow-up requirements[10]. With the globalization approach, rivalry has acted as a beneficial element to the consumers. This is initially noted in the reduction of switching costs that has made substitution very easy. Therefore, once a consumer meets with an inadequate sales individual thereby lacking the desired goals and handling the most rational decision is to switch to another firm and thus lessening the existing market. More to this, the consumer may discourage other present consumers from the company as well as potential clients.

Secondly, sales persons lacking the required job expertise enhance the training overheads required to shape the person into an effectual worker[11]. In most business establishments, recruiting and selection overheads comprise of advertisement expenditures attributed to the various channels utilized for purposes of publicizing the sales positions. Interview sessions also require monetary outflows; coupling this with the selection overheads makes the recruitment process quite an investment to an organization. Tertiary overheads are noted in opportunity costs conducted by the human resource manager in terms of the time spent within the hiring need whereas the manager would have employed the same period for beneficial elements[12]. Therefore, at such an instance an organization bear two alternatives; the first concerns offering the required training to the individual towards imparting the required sales skills or disposing them and launching once more into the hiring need. Note that, either of the alternatives accords additional overheads to the organization and therefore the prudent choice would be to adopt the less costly approach. Of course, all these can be avoided with the selection of a good salesperson[13].

Thirdly, wrong sales persons also require a higher supervisory element in ensuring that the proper workload is achieved and within the required channels[14]. This is mainly attributed to the fact that majority of individuals necessitating such treatment are usually wrongly placed within the sales career and therefore lack the intrinsic impetus required to achieve the given workload within a specified duration. Enhanced supervision therefore escalates the job package for the manager acting as a stress entry area. Strained workers tend to be very limited in terms of service delivery and in turn tend to relay their anger and frustrations to other employees creating a rippling effect within the organization[15]. Such ineffectuality will lead to a given cost within the business. Additionally, the sales individual may react negatively to the intensive nature of supervision and thus inhibiting the desired delivery. Both impacts are quite unconstructive within the working setting as it diminishes the fulfillment element, a very significant element in worker motivation.

Fourthly, unfit sales individuals lead to less than optimal performances within the working setting and this has an adverse impact on the sales levels and subsequently the business proceeds[16]. Human resource managers may sometimes be forced to pick a given number of the workforce from an inadequate set of interviewees following poor turnovers. In other instances however, the selection may just pick a wrong individual based on inadequate assessment before hiring practices but the consequences remain the same. Optimal performances within an organization are achieved when an individual offers the highest level of sales in terms of proceeds value within the least costs possible due to the efficiency element[17]. The higher the difference noted on the proceeds and the overheads, the more better it becomes for the organization as profitability is enhanced. A less than optimal performance will therefore offer good results as opposed to an optimal setting where the best is realized. This difference between the two modes is actually termed as loss within the organization.   

Lastly, wrong salespersons bear the inability to initiate and sustain important associations with consumers as the market base[18]. This is noted in instances where the proficiency towards communication is compromised by lack of proper sales character like patience. Consumer preservation and acquisition of additional markets serves as the foremost objective in all commercial institutions. Consumers comprise of the largest stakeholders within a company after the shareholder, as they constitute to large supports for trade development through purchases. Salespersons are skilled to compel consumers towards higher purchases as this enhances the returns levels. Consumer loyalty is actually initiated through such relay channels with the implementation of a given product within the market and then the inclusion of the sales team as the tangible link between the sales procedures[19].

Although various promotional tools are present within the present timings, the salespeople bear a notable advantage over channels like television and radio promotions as they offer a tangible experience to a consumer. This regards the need for additional information, as the responses are synchronous in nature. Therefore, a wrong salesperson lacks this element and thus eliminates the need for retention within the organization, as the other aforementioned channels prove to be more effectual and cost sensitive[20]. In conclusion, it is evident that although salespersons may be treated as an insignificant tool within the work setting they actually hold the ability to destroy or enhance a given organization. A proper sales team should be aim of every business in order to overcome the financial losses attached to ineffectual hiring habits and this should be determined by a professional hiring department.

 

Bibliography

Avlonitis, George J. Selling and Sales Management. New York, NY: Elsevier, 2010.

Carter, Robert E., Andrea L. Dixon, and William C. Moncrief. 2008. “The Complexities of Sales and Sales Management Research: A Historical Analysis from 1990 to 2005”. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 28, no. 4: 403-420.

Cook, Thomas A. The Art of Mastering Sales Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010.

Crittenden, Victoria L., Robert A. Peterson, and Gerald Albaum. 2010. “Technology and Business-to-Consumer Selling: Contemplating Research and Practice”. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 30, no. 2: 103-110.

Cron, William L., Thomas E. DeCarlo, and Douglas J. Dalrymple. Dalrymple’s Sales Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.

Donaldson, Bill. Sales Management: Principles, Process and Practice. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

EBSCO Publishing (Firm). Sales & marketing management. New York, N.Y.: Sales and Marketing Management, 1975.

Falvey, Jack. The Absolute Very Best of– Jack Falvey on Sales Management: 1991 Edition. Londerry, N.H.: Intermark, 1991.

Forsyth, Patrick. Sales Management. Oxford, UK: Capstone Pub, 2002.

Gschwandtner, Gerhard. The Essential Sales Management Handbook: Your Secret Weapon to Success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2007.

Jobber, David, and Geoffrey Lancaster. Selling and Sales Management. Harlow, England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, 2006.

McBane, Donald A., Ellen Bolman Pullins, and David A. Reid. 2003. “SalesLitDB: A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND INDEX OF THE SALES-RELATED LITERATURE”. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 23, no. 2: 115-123.

Miller, William. ProActive Sales Management How to Lead, Motivate, and Stay Ahead of the Game. New York, NY: AMACOM, 2001.

Pi Sigma Epsilon (Fraternity). The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. New York: Pi Sigma Epsilon, 1981.

Polonsky, Michael, and Allison Ringer. 2009. “The Global and Regional Dispersion of Publishing in the Field of International Marketing”. Journal of Global Marketing. 22, no. 2: 155-172.

Sales & Marketing Management. New York, NY: Sales and Marketing Management, 1975.

Schwartz, Matthew. Fundamentals of Sales Management for the Newly Appointed Sales Manager. New York, NY: AMACOM, 2006.

Simpkins, Robert A. The Secrets of Great Sales Management Advanced Strategies for Maximizing Performance. New York, NY: American Management Association, 2004.

Valentine, Sean. 2009. “Ethics Training, Ethical Context, and Sales and Marketing Professionals’ Satisfaction with Supervisors and Coworkers”. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 29, no. 3: 227-242.

Vyas Preeta; Mehta Bijal. Classification of Empirical Work on Sales Promotion: A Synthesis for Managerial Decision Making. 1970.



[1] Robert A. Simpkins, The Secrets of Great Sales Management Advanced Strategies for Maximizing Performance

(New York: American Management Association, 2004).

[2] David Jobber and Geoffrey Lancaster, Selling and Sales Management (Harlow, England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, 2006).

[3] George J. Avlonitis, Selling and Sales Management (New York, NY: Elsevier, 2010).

[4] Pi Sigma Epsilon (Fraternity), The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management (New York: Pi Sigma Epsilon, 1981).

[5] Matthew Schwartz, Fundamentals of Sales Management for the Newly Appointed Sales Manager (New York:

AMACOM, 2006).

[6] Michael Polonsky, and Allison Ringer 2009, “The Global and Regional Dispersion of Publishing in the Field of International Marketing” (Journal of Global Marketing. 22, no. 2: 155-172).

[7] Robert E., Carter Andrea L. Dixon, and William C. Moncrief. 2008, “The Complexities of Sales and Sales Management Research: A Historical Analysis from 1990 to 2005″(Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 28, no. 4: 403-420).

[8] Sales & Marketing Management (New York, NY: Sales and Marketing Management, 1975).

 

[9] William L. Cron, Thomas E. DeCarlo, and Douglas J. Dalrymple, Dalrymple’s Sales Management (Hoboken, NJ:

John Wiley & Sons, 2006).

[10] Jack Falvey, The Absolute Very Best of– Jack Falvey on Sales Management: 1991 Edition (Londerry, N.H.: Intermark, 1991).

[11] Thomas A. Cook, The Art of Mastering Sales Management (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010).

[12] Patrick Forsyth, Sales Management (Oxford, U.K.: Capstone Pub, 2002).

[13] Vyas Preeta; Mehta Bijal, Classification of Empirical Work on Sales Promotion: A Synthesis for Managerial Decision Making (1970).

[14] Donald A. McBane, Ellen Bolman Pullins, and David A. Reid. 2003, “SalesLitDB: A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND INDEX OF THE SALES-RELATED LITERATURE” (Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 23, no. 2: 115-123).

[15] William Miller, ProActive Sales Management How to Lead, Motivate, and Stay Ahead of the Game (New York:

AMACOM, 2001).

[16] Victoria L. Crittenden Robert A. Peterson, and Gerald Albaum. 2010, “Technology and Business-to-Consumer Selling: Contemplating Research and Practice” (Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 30, no. 2: 103-110).

[17] Sean Valentine 2009, “Ethics Training, Ethical Context, and Sales and Marketing Professionals’ Satisfaction with Supervisors and Coworkers” (Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 29, no. 3: 227-242).

[18] Gerhard Gschwandtner, The Essential Sales Management Handbook: Your Secret Weapon to Success (New

York: McGraw-Hill, 2007).

[19] Bill Donaldson, Sales Management: Principles, Process and Practice (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).

[20] EBSCO Publishing (Firm), Sales & marketing management (New York, N.Y.: Sales and Marketing Management, 1975).

 

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered