The Annotated Bibliography must include at least five reputable sources, whether those sources come from our Digital Casebook, The Politics of Sports, or somewhere else. Additionally, each of your five annotations must include the following, described on page 243 of the chapter on Canvas:
A correct MLA Works Cited Page Entry for that source.
A Descriptive Annotation summarizing the argument, explaining its main points, and describing the method or structure of the argument.
An Evaluative Annotation (a.k.a. Critical Annotation) reflecting on the sources role in your project, explaining how it adds to your understanding of the QAI, explaining whether it changes your understanding of the conversation, demonstrating how it relates to your other sources and might lead to new sources, etc.
here are the links for five sources: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/fifa-corruption-scandal-sepp-blatter-reveals-agreement-in-place-for-russia-to-host-2018-world-cup-a6712061.html
https://mic.com/articles/58649/russia-s-anti-gay-law-spelled-out-in-plain-english#.wPyBo4j9v
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/international/russia-2018-racism-guaranteed-at-world-cup-as-incidents-double-a6768701.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/24/football/world-cup-fifa-russia-racism-football/
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/attack-on-russian-police-station-raises-world-cup-2018-concerns-1.2853584
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|