Critically examine the evolution of the right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 in resisting deportation

Word count 1,500 exact excluding footnotes and the bibliography

Question to be answered:

The Immigration Act 2014 has created legal uncertainty in the interpretation and application of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights towards immigrants and asylum seekers’.

Critically examine the evolution of the right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 in resisting deportation using relevant case law.

Instructions

• Discuss how Article 8 has evolved under European Convention on Human Rights 1950

in relation to immigration and asylum cases,

• Analyse how Article 8 and European Convention on Human Rights 1950

has been interpreted and applied.

• Anticipate the further development of Article 8 and European Convention on Human Rights 1950

•Provide an indepth and critical analysis of the nature Article 8 and European Convention on Human Rights 1950

•The research for this question will involve caselaw, journal articles and reports

•Discuss the scope of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 with regards to the Immigration Act 2014

• Outline a general understanding of the relationship between immigration law and Article 8 and European Convention on Human Rights 1950

• Critically analyse the appreciation of the European Convention of Human Rights 1950 through the operation of 1998 Human Rights Act

• Show an understanding of the criteria of applying Article 8 to asylum seeker

•The answer must contain appropriate research references with respect to the immigration and asylum law

• write how the research was carried out and where materials were located, and this is not included into the word count

• Use the OSCOLA reference style

•Include footnotes throughout, and this is not included in the word count

Last Completed Projects