ASSIGNMENT 3
Asia-Pacific Business Logic Compared to Others (20%)
Word limit and formatting
1,500 words. You will need to decide how you will structure your analysis.
Assessment
The reports will be assessed on the insight, cogency, clarity and quality of the strategic logic underlying your analysis.
The assessment criteria include:
• Knowledge, application and content (90%)
o Detailed research into the Asian business logic and some of the ways of thinking and doing business in Asia-Pacific
o Correct application of course concepts;
o Evidence of critical thinking and analysis, including sound use of data to support analysis;
• Expression (10%)
o Professional presentation and structure;
o Logic and clarity of expression;
o Use of academic and professional conventions (e.g., use of business language, appropriate referencing, if needed.
Other criteria
Those students who push their analysis further will be rewarded. The best assignments will also contain a critical reflection on what new knowledge and skills have been learnt as a result of this analysis, why they are important and how these will be applied to everyday managerial practice or policy.
Assessment
Attributes
0-34
(Fail 2– F2)
Unacceptable 35-49
(Fail 1 – F1)
Poor
50-64
(Pass -P)
Functional 65-74
(Credit – CR)
Proficient 75-84
(Distinction – DN)
Advanced 85-100
(High Distinction – HD)
Exceptional
Grade Description) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the course, insufficient understanding of the course content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of course learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the course or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the course. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills.
1. Knowledge, application and content (90%)
• Detailed research into the company and industry;
• Correct application of course concepts;
• Evidence of critical thinking and analysis, including sound use of data to support analysis;
• A proper balance between background information, analysis and recommendations
Limited research into Asian business logic.
Limited understanding of required concepts
Little evidence of critical thinking and analysis.
Key components of the assignment are not addressed/ assignment is not complete
Makes assertions that are not justified.
The report is balanced toward description vs analysis and recommendations.
Adequate research into Asian business logic. Limited understanding of the concepts.
Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence and course materials.
Some support with data, but could be improved.
The report is complete.
Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion.
The report is mainly descriptive, but contains some analysis.
Thorough research into Asian business logic.
Thorough understanding of the concepts
Analysis is well supported by data
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
The report is complete.
Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion.
A good balance between description and analysis. Detailed research into the players Asian business logic.
Highly developed understanding of the conceptual material.
Well demonstrated capacity to apply relevant concepts to explain the situation.
Analysis is very well supported by data and is complete.
Justifies any conclusions reached with well-developed arguments.
A good balance between description and analysis. Detailed research into Asian business logic.
A sophisticated understanding of the field conceptual material.
Mastery of conceptual material to explain the situation.
The report is well supported by data and is complete.
Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments.
A good balance between description and analysis .
2. Expression (10%)
• Professional presentation and structure;
• Logic and clarity of expression;
• Use of academic and professional conventions (e.g., use of business language, appropriate referencing, if needed.
Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar.
Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
There are mistakes in using the APA style. Has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction.
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Is well-written and structured
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well written.
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented, the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Expertly written.
Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|