Historical Sociology – Handout Notes

The handout is to be designed to be useful as a summary. Generally, a means of communicating clearly for students to follow it. So, please make sections if possible. For example, the historical progression of historical sociology according to the literature, as well as a section for all the mentioned pieces of work in the literature along with their specific contribution. Perhaps include sociological vocabulary that might be novel for first time readers. This summary should follow the same order of paragraphs as in the literature.

Please write it in bullet points and include the page numbers from the literature within the summary, so as to follow the summary according to the literature\’s progression.

Some examples are included.

I am unsure of how many words are needed, however I have purchased 4 pages. Hopefully, that will be enough to cover all the literature, but if not please notify me. If four pages is not necessary, then also notify me.
Instruction files

historical_sociology_summary_example_1.docx(24,76 KiB)
historical_sociology_summary_example_2.docx(145,31 KiB)
kumar_historical_sociology.pdf(2,27 MiB)
File uploaded by writer

file.docx (11,05 KiB)
Uploaded on 09-08-2016, 10:58. Downloaded by customer on 10-08-2016, 13:00
order_id_1501018_revised.doc (40,00 KiB)
Downloaded by customer on 09-08-2016, 17:56
order_id_1501018.doc (37,00 KiB)
Downloaded by customer on 09-08-2016, 12:57
Old files
order_id_1501018.1.doc(37,00 KiB)
hi id like to request a revision of the work, please. it isnt detailed enough. the writer describes what the author of the paper wrote, but does not explain how. there arent many examples included.

order_id_1501018_revised.2.doc(40,00 KiB)
this is still not what i asked for. this is not a summary of the content. this is a description of the writing. imagine this needing to be handed to student to use as a condensed version of the article. please rewrite. follow examples provided. thank-you.

order_id_1501018_revised.2.doc(40,00 KiB)
Lack of examples. Samples were not properly followed. Proofreading drawbacks. Lack of analysis. Revision is recommended.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered