Is Global warming groundless or a scientific fact

Outline

Introductory paragraph
Thesis statement
Major points
Introduce your position
State the opposing position
State your rebuttal to the opposing position

Is Global warming groundless or a scientific fact

Global warming is one of the climatic concepts that illustrate a situation that indicates a rise in the mean temperatures within the surface of the earth, with integration of both the air and large water masses. In essence, scientists use this definition in explaining the swift increase in temperature. However, based on the various customs and norms, most people during the early times, relates increase in temperature as a suggestion of god’s anger (Majumdar, 2001). People thought that god’s fury was on them, and there was a need to appease him (Perkins, 2008).

Scientists have invented various strategies to establish the existence of global warming. They have huge evidences that explain the massive rise in temperature by watching the mean air conditions and the varying oceanic temperatures. In addition, scientists cite huge liquefying of icebergs and snow as facts to endorse the rise in temperature. Further evidence that explains the existence of global warming is the rise in mean sea level. Some of other factors cited by scientists as causes of global warming are the excessive emission of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (Agrawala, 1999). Most of the machines, for instance the automobiles greatly contribute in emitting these gases. Comparing the various facts suggested by scientists and the traditional myths, it is undeniable that Global Warming is a reality and not groundless.

Fossil fuel also contributes to the release of these gases. This occurs mainly when running the power plants. Another significant contributive factor towards global warming is the quantity of fertilizers used by the farmers. It is true that farmers use fertilizer in order to acquire productive yield, but this has a negative effect in varying the temperature (Agrawala, 1999).

Increase in sea level is one of the primary factors that cause global warming. As cited by scientists, when the snow and the icebergs melt, they increase the level of water capacity in the seas and other large water masses, thus, varying their temperature. In addition, global warming also results to annihilation of properties and lives. The major cause is the rise and fall of storms, which raises the temperature. Furthermore, as the temperature varies, and primarily, the high temperatures cause famine, which cuts down the overall population and impedes crop production. This happens because plants species that cannot endure high temperature are likely to die (Campbell, 2007). Therefore, if all the mentioned effects occur as people observe, then, it is undeniable that global warming is a scientific reality.

In endorsing this scientific fact, Bill Clinton asserted global warming as a scientific reality caused by various human activities. One may refute with this statement and consider it as baseless fact with unsatisfactory evidence, but it is somewhat correct. Indeed, global warming is a scientific reality; I tend to disagree with Bill Clinton that the main cause is the human activity. It also occurs because of nature, and, therefore, not a myth. People have various delusions concerning global warming, but as research indicates, little knowledge contributes to making baseless arguments to what global warming means (Agrawala, 1999).

In supporting Bill Clinton, Grawala argues that human activities contribute greatly in causing huge climatic change because numerous activities occurring in the global world revolve around burning of the fossil fuels and deforestation. These fossils emit carbon dioxide that contains atmospheric lifespan of approximately 200 to 500 years. Scientists prove that 51% of the emitted gases are mainly carbon dioxide from both plants and trees. Oceans emit about 45% while as the fossil fuels releases around a 3% of the total carbon dioxide released (Agrawala, 1999). Therefore, based on the evidences proven by the scientists, it is apparent that global warming is a scientific reality and not groundless.

The comprehensive research conducted by scientists provide facts that global warming is a scenario that is in existence and proven. A relevant example happened in the past three decade, where there was a high rise in temperature in the whole world with a rise of .50C. This occurred between 1961 and 1997, whereby the global world lost approximately cubic miles of ice. This scenario illustrates that traditions and norms hardly play any part in explaining the existence of global warming. However, other people tend to think that Human beings are responsible for destroying their habitats, thus, interfering with the overall Mother Nature. This is the reason why the world is being destroyed by mystical forces (Leroux, 2005).

Contrary to mystical beliefs, environmental bottom line is tied on the quantity of energy used, as well as the contribution that such energy towards global warming. Further, this process is dependent on raw material sources used in processing plants, their impact to the environment upon extraction, and quantity of water use, as well as the underlined level of environmental risk. When organizations get this wrong, environmental cost will be higher and will increase the need for global action. This has made many governments to increase the prices for extracting these precious commodities through higher taxes that it was in the previous years (Campbell, 2007).

Corporations are required to identify areas, which the operation have ecological impacts to the environment, such as operations, customer and the community. They are required to take dramatic and substantial steps in water conservation, product recycling and reforestation initiatives, which moves the closer to aspirations and goals of sustainable environments. This is achieved through sound management practices, which help in reducing impacts of their activities to the environment. Achievement of these goals requires dedication of substantial financial resources in on for the environmental effects of these operations to be reduced. In addition, the development of environmentally friendly products is key as well (Campbell, 2007).

It is apparent that sustainability is no longer a priority. Human beings are exploiting and misusing natural resources and eventually blaming nature for the consequences suffered. Recently, various scenarios illustrate the global warming as a scientific reality and not groundless. Numerous research studies conducted by scientists verify that, human activities, volcanic eruptions, carbon dioxide emissions, melting of snows and gases are some facts that contribute to global warming.

Therefore, instead of blaming the wrath of God on the destruction of the planet by unsustainable activities, people should embrace their responsibility. They are required to take dramatic and substantial steps in water conservation, product recycling and reforestation initiatives, which moves the closer to aspirations and goals of sustainable environments. In the 21^st century, almost all human activities result to global warming. Comparing the various facts suggested by scientists and the traditional myths, it is undeniable that Global Warming is a reality and not groundless.

References

Agrawala, S. (1999). Early Scienceâ€“policy Interactions In Climate Change: Lessons From The Advisory Group On Greenhouse Gases. Global Environmental Change, 9(2), 157-169.

Agrawala, S. (1999). Science advisory mechanisms in multilateral decision-making: three models from the global climate change regime. Diss: Diss., Princeton University.

Campbell, K. M. (2007). The age of consequences the foreign policy and national security implications of global climate change. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic & International Studies :.

Leroux, M. (2005). Global warming: myth or reality : the erring ways of climatology. Berlin: Springer ;.

Majumdar, D. (2001). Global Warming: A Myth?. Resonance, 6(7), 13-21.

Perkins, S. (2008). Story One: Cooling Climate â€˜consensusâ€™ Of 1970s Never Was: Myth Often Cited By Global Warming Skeptics Debunked. Science News, 174(9), 5-6.