Writing Assignment: Based on your independent research that includes at least three sources, in preparation for developing a possible policy proposal to establish an administrative search program (not criminal) for presentation to the corporate executive staff, write an academic paper that explores the use and legalities of an administrative, non-coercive, care taking search program instituted by private security operatives to address real or perceived company losses resulting from significant internal theft. After reading and evaluating Judge Edward Weinfeld’s opinion in Chenkin v. BELLEVUE HOSP. CTR., NYC, ETC., 479 F. Supp. 207 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), found in the eReadings section of the online classroom, consider the opinion and respond to the following:(1) Write a strong introduction, first stating the purpose of the paper, then providing a succinct recitation of the significant facts in this case.(2) Describe the issues related to the search program the court needed to resolve.(3) Explain the positions that Chenkin and Bellevue advanced to the court regarding Chenkin’s claim that the hospital’s package control system was unconstitutional.(4) Provide details of the court’s ruling and rationale and be sure to describe the important features of the search procedure instituted by Belleville that in the view of the court rejected Chenkin’s claims.(5) As a practical matter, evaluate how this court decision impacts security operations. Be specific and comprehensive.(6) Explain how the results of this case will be used in any policy proposals you make to the corporate executives.The length of the proposal will be between 1,000 and 1,500 words and students will use and properly cite and reference in APA format at least three sources, including the court’s opinion. Course instructional material may be used and cited, but may not be included in the three sources required.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|