article response Essay 3
Read the article Ancestry in a Drop of Blood by Karen Kaplan, published on August 30, 2005 in the Los Angeles Times. A link to the article is posted on Titanium. The article is posted on-line at:
Be sure to read all three pages! To move forward in the article, youll need to click on a new page number at the bottom of each page!
Write a short essay (1-3 pages) to summarize the article. In your essay, integrate other information from the course. Chapter 15 of our textbook discusses these issues, also. Chapter 1 of our textbook discusses DNA testing briefly in Who is a Native American. Chapter 2 of our textbook discusses historical events that have required Indian peoples to define themselves or be defined by others. (Also, you may know some other interesting information to integrate into your essay!) In your essay, use the key terms DNA testing, blood quantum, tribal membership, and racism.
Grading is based on eight Critical Thinking criteria, plus a Writing Skills criterion, listed below. Your overall grade on the assignment is the total of your best scores on 8 of the 9 criteria, plus 1 point; your lowest score will be dropped. The maximum possible points equal 25. The following symbols correspond to the following scores:
-0 points; F (criterion not addressed) or D (criterion addressed vaguely or incorrectly)
-1 point; C (criterion addressed, but minimally or without clear understanding)
2 points; B (criterion addressed adequately and clearly, in the writers own words)
+3 points; A (criterion addressed adequately and clearly, with mastery, in the writers own words)
1: Identifies the question.
() Identifies the question/topic, providing a clear statement early in the essay to inform the reader about the essays focus. What does it mean to be Indian?
(+) Also identifies nuances or subsidiary issues. For example, who decides what it means to be Indian? Why do Indian people care? Why do non-Indian people care?
2: Identifies students perspective.
() Identifies students perspective on the subject. Dont just take one side, pro or con — consider the complexities!
(+) Identifies students perspective, drawing from personal experience or other information not available in assigned readings.
3: Identifies key perspectives.
() Identifies the main perspective(s) in assigned readings. Who favors DNA testing as a way to define eligibility for tribal membership, and why? Who has negative perspectives, and why?
(+) Also adds complementary or opposing perspectives from outside sources.
4: Identifies key assumptions in perspectives in assigned readings.
() Why does the author think this is an important issue to consider?
(+) Addresses ethical issues raised by assumptions underlying the argument, or questions the validity of the assumptions. For example, what benefits or problems might result from DNA testing as a way to define tribal membership? Should biological heritage or cultural heritage be considered more important, if someone was adopted as a tribal member? Can you think of other important consequences or ethical issues that might be raised by DNA testing?
5: Identifies the evidence that supports the argument made in the assigned readings.
() Identifies evidence presented in the assigned reading to support the argument made in the assigned reading. What specific examples does Kaplan provide to support her main point(s)?
(+) Additionally, distinguishes argument or opinion from fact, goes to cited materials to examine the sources of evidence used in the assigned reading, examines other sources of evidence to support or refute the assigned reading, or raises questions about why the evidence might not be accepted by some people.
6: Identifies context. Identifies the context in which the argument presented in the assigned readings must be understood. For example, culture, society, science, education, technology, ethics, politics, personal experience, etc.
() What events in society today, or in the past, have made DNA testing important to some Indian people, according to the article?
(+) Identifies additional contexts of importance. What larger social issues in the U.S. are related to the questions Who is an Indian?
7. Identifies the conclusions of the assigned reading. Ideally, this should be done in the conclusion of your essay. Try using a subheading called Conclusion. A conclusion should be a minimum of one paragraph.
() Identifies the conclusions of the assigned readings accurately, clearly, and fully.
(+) Additionally, discusses the implications of the conclusions.
8. Uses key terms: DNA testing blood quantum tribal membership racism
() Uses key terms accurately and conveys a clear understanding of the terms.
(+) Also defines key terms.
9. Writing Skills.
() Writes skillfully with few errors, good paragraph construction, clear sentences, appropriate word choices, and a complete bibliography
(+) A writing style that is clear, concise, well-organized, convincing, on-point, and almost flawless.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.