These are the marking criteria.
-Abstract offers a succinct summary of the work. The Introduction effectively sets the context for the study and offers a rationale of the choice and relevance of the topic, and provides an overview of the work.
-Evidence of a comprehensive literature search which draws on relevant, appropriate and up to date references, and from which the research question clearly emerges.
-Appraisal of primary research sources demonstrating understanding of the methodology and/or relevant theoretical frameworks.
-Aims, objectives and research question/hypothesis are clearly defined and articulated.
-Ethical Issues and research governance processes are addressed and clearly evidenced.
-Selection of methodological approach is clearly illustrated and justified. Data analysis is presented with clarity and detail.
-Evidence of ability to discuss debate and analyse findings and issues arising from these (there is progression of argument and evidence of originality).
-Constructive conclusion is offered and potential for future research identified.
-Work is presented in a logical structure with fluent academic style, and is of appropriate length. Accurate referencing and citation style in the text and presentation of complete and accurate Bibliography.
-Learning log detailing the development and progress of the study is appended.
And this is the guideline that they gave me.
-Abstract
a small summary of the paper.
Aims and question focus
key points of your review outcomes
-Introduction
background and context of the topic of interest
current development debate in relation to the topic
aims
-Method
literature searching (any RCTs, clinical cases etc), key words, databases (AMED, PUB MED, Cochrane library, cinahl, Medline, etc)
criteria for inclusion and exclusion
-Results: names of the good papers, numbers of included/ excluded with brief explanations, can be use table
-Critical review (review themes)
research findings, debate/ arguments
methodology
discussions (criticise the papers)
future research
-Conclusion
you will synthesise your account using relevant theoretical perspectives identified in your literature review.
-References
follow the guideline
+Also I was thinking to add some small paragraphs about the hepatitis a, b and c which are more usual. These are some links that may help: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Hepatitis/Pages/Introduction.aspx
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006062/The-biggest-disaster-NHS-s-history-2-000-died-34-000-given-HIV-hepatitis-C-infected-blood-took-30-years-apology.html
http://infectiousdiseases.screening.nhs.uk/hepbaudit
+Also I was thinking to add some paragraphs about the main use that xiao chaihu tang had in ancient times (from shan han lun) and how it uses in modern times.
Please let me know if you have some better plan. I was just thinking that may the above would be a good idea.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|