C. Content–Pleaseaddressthefollowing:1. Overall remarksa. You are being asked to provide an analysis of a website. Your readers are counting onyou to visit the website and clearly explain:i. Who is responsible for putting up (and maintaining) this site;ii. What type of information can be found on this site, and is it reliable;iii. Where is the site (its URL);iv. When was this site put up (and has it been maintained); andv. Why is this a reliable or unreliable source for information on the topic (or anything in between). What can be added to, or subtracted from, the site?2. Approach the writing of the review in the following waya. Brief introductory paragraph (the “who” and “where”) mentioned aboveb. Analysis–the“meat”of the paper–an explanation of the “what,” “when,” and “why” mentioned abovei. Avoid writing the review as a “process,” – by this I mean that you should not de- scribe how you reviewed the site (“When visiting this site, first I clicked on the ‘About’ link and I was immediately taken to a page that…”). Can you see how repetitive and – frankly – boring such an approach would be? Your reader does not want a “blow by blow” retelling of your visit, but a solid analysis of what this site is about and why it would be (or would not be) useful.c. Brief conclusion summarizing your analysis and telling the reader if visiting this site is “worth his/her time.”I attached the actual PDF file that has the above instructions in it
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|