Please answer the following questions and supply for EACH ONE an example to illustrate a major point, and example can be real or hypothetical, as well as supply an EXPLANATION of the example. I will upload the chapter’s power point presentation from the book.
1.What is the difference between the disparate treatment and the disparate or adverse impact theories in civil rights laws in the United States? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 21; tied to course competencies 1 and 2)
2. How has the U.S. Supreme Court made it much more difficult to have legal race and gender based affirmative action plans? Are the recent Supreme Court affirmative action decisions moral ones? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 21 and Business Ethics text Chapter 17; tied to course competencies 1, 2, 3, and 4)
3. What is the distinction between a monopoly and monopolization pursuant to the Sherman anti-trust act? Why is this distinction critical? Are monopolies immoral? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 20; tied to course competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4)
For the case: Please answer the questions at the end of the case study attached and write your initial response to the case questions one to two brief paragraphs per question, in which you answer the case study question asked, justify any conclusions in a well reasoned manner, and support any legal, moral, and social responsibility conclusions by making reference to legal, ethical, and social responsibility principles. You must also provide an example, real or hypothetical, from the book or current events, as well as a brief explanation of the example.