Task Details:
As you write your annotated paragraph include both a summary of the source AND an evaluation of the validity of the source. Paragraphs should be in full sentences
Summarize the content of the source be descriptive and specific
Evaluate the accuracy and validity of the source
The format should list the referencing information, then the appropriate paragraph annotation followed by the next referencing information and annotation. All entries should be typed and double spaced.This assignment includes the following stages:
Stage 1: Summarize
What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say?
Stage 2: Reflect
How it fits into your research? Was this source helpful to you? Is the information accurate and valid to your research? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research paper? Has it changed how you think about your topic?Read the annotated bibliography and justify the grade given. Use examples from text to prove your answer. What does the article do well and what could be improved.
“Bibliographical entry
(if applicable)*”
Author/Publishing organization
Year of Publication
Title of the source
Name of the publisher
Place of Publication
URL*
Journal title*
Article title*
Volume/number*
Page numbers*
Potash, Brett. (2010) “We Live in a Wikiworld: Should our Students?”Independent Schoo. 98-105.
This article is very nice. It opposed the claim that I hoped to support (that Wikipedia should not be used as an academic source). Consequently, I read numerous other options. All agreed with the findings of this piece, only they did so with far more words and numbers. This process changed my stance on the issue and convinced me to return to this summary article as a viable option. And so what were initially weaknesses (informality and brevity), became strengths. While the audience is the readers of Independent Schools, this article is suitable for academic and popular consumption. The purpose it serves is to consider the question of the creation of knowledge, to help resistant teachers and students accept the role of Wikipedia in academia,and to address potential opportunities to teach students the im/proper uses of Wikipedia and how critical thinking can aid in deciphering.
Freire, Paulo. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed : 70-86. Print.
In Pedagogy of the Oppressed Paulo Freire discusses the narrative character between students and teachers.Freire goes into much detail stating that memorization, known as the banking concept, is not the key to learning. Finally, Freire goes and explains the learning method he thinks is the most beneficial with major critical thinking, and problem-posting method.This article relates to my research question because it talks about my topic and has many points that I can use in my paper.
”
Analysis and Selection of Information”Students did not attempt to analyze the information collected and/or did not identify any appropriate sections to support their thesis Student attempted to analyze the information collected and identified a minimal number of appropriate sections to support their thesis Student attempted to analyze the information collected and identified some appropriate sections to support their thesis but not sufficiently Student analyzed the information collected and identified appropriate sections to sufficiently support their thesis with some irrelevant details Student analyzed the information collected and identified appropriate sections to support their thesis with few irrelevant details Student analyzed the information collected and identified appropriate sections to well-support their thesis with minor irrelevant details
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|