A compare and contrast of the Spanish conquests of Peru (by Pizarro), of the Americas (by Columbus), and mainly Mexico (by Cortez)

Essay Topic: Reflect on Ken Burns and Stephen Ives\’ documentary episode of The West, \”The People.\” Then, use your general knowledge as well as reliable outside sources to discuss the particular ways in which the conquest of Mexico by Cortez were carried out. Second, discuss the differences between the conquest of Mexico versus that of Peru ( by Francisco Pizarro ) and versus that of the Americas (by Christopher Columbus). What made the execution of the conquest of Mexico different from the other two? Explain.Focus on concepts of: relationship with the indigenous, spreading of Christianity, search for gold, the element of fear and shock of a foreign peoples, and the advantages/disadvantages, motives, and attitudes of the both conquistadores and the indigenous.- the documentary as well as the source provided below do NOT need to be seen/read thoroughly; they are only for reference purposes.Essay must be:- simple enough to translate- no direct quotations- argumentative and interesting- well-organizedOutline:Paragraph 1: Introduction- Historical context- ThesisParagraph 2: The ways in which Cortez and the Spanish executed the conquest of MexicoParagraph 3: The ways in which the conquest of Peru and the Americas were different from that of Mexico, the case of Mexico was different because _____Paragraph 4: Conclusion- restatement of thesis- conclusion about the larger topic