Homeland Security

Name:

Lecturer:

Course:

Date:

Homeland Security

The main aim of national preparedness is to strengthen national security in order to prevent and counter any threat that maybe of massive danger to the country’s security. These threats may include terror operations, tragic natural adversities, and computer-generated attacks among others. It is the responsibility of everyone to protect the country from any danger. Therefore, it is important to recognize the significance of formulating objectives that will spot the competence required for the preparedness and the country’s preparedness system. This will facilitate activities that will make it possible for the country to achieve its purpose (Obama, 2011).

Post-9/11 Legal Basis for Homeland Security Initiatives

The secretary in charge of Homeland security will supervise the inter-agency development of a schedule, which should complete the country’s awareness development goals. The development of the plans shall be ascertained through the help of the public, the local government, the private and the public sector. The finalization arrangement shall be presented to me for authorization within a speculated time of six months. The preparedness vision shall be able to address the various factors that facilitate international crimes and how to alleviate such offenses. The objectives shall be able to provide a different approach that minimizes the use of the available resources. In addition, it will be advisable to assess constantly the objectives in order to ensure that they are aligned with the ever-changing guiding principles of security.

The set goals should be incorporated into a comprehensive approach to enhance the country’s security. After the duration of eight months, the secretary is supposed to develop and present me with a description of the implemented plan. The country’s preparedness system enables the country to meet the stated objectives of the country. It shall include planning for the country’s main agenda and provide protection together with measures of responses among others. The framework mentioned shall be based on flexibility. In addition, the national preparedness will include an inter-agency operation plan to support each planning agenda. It shall also contain suggestions and guidance to support the preparedness of business, families and individuals (Bush, 2003).

Some centers of fusion have emerged as the sole information-sharing center for both law and a point of counter-acting terrorist organizations. Teams that do the data collection and analysis sift much raw data to reveal, envisage and prevent the major crimes and the most prevalent terrorism attacks (Martin & James 125). However, the New York is not and has never been part of the effort initiated and therefore has always been alienated from the privacy and the civil liberty policies pre-requisites. The large part of the requirements is the funding eligibility for states and cities that are implicated in the country. The result, thereby, being on domestic surveillance that initiates the collection of information on –in this case- American citizens. This is surely done without any probable cause and information stored in computers with databases is subjected to a legal oversight. The federal law enforcement agencies and homeland security executives will keep in check the New York’s finest to ensure a de facto state agency without the oversight.

The Secretary of Homeland Security will also be tasked with the mandate of providing a framework for public awareness. This shall include all programs that are designed to offer individual preparedness and enable individuals to deal with the immense possibilities that exist. In addition, the private program sector shall be able to facilitate national flexibility, the provision of monetary support to the federal government, preparedness attempts by the federal government, and national investigation together with advancement attempts. The universal task list comprises of a list of probable military responsibilities at the operational, strategic and tactical level of combat (Bush, 2003). It gives a menu of capabilities that a commander may select to carry out the duty assigned to him or her. Through this, the universal task list enables the country to be protective of its surroundings and to be cautious of any terror attacks that may be a threat to the security of a country. Therefore, it is important to state that the universal task force is of benefit to the country and should be frequently reviewed to ensure the list is of relevance and is useful to the country in case of an attack.

Lastly, the three elements are supposed to function together to ensure that the government and non-governmental organizations, the private division, and the public achieve the desired levels. Through this, they represent ideal states of preparedness by capability for the purpose of a common planning and measurement framework. Nevertheless, the real preparedness investment plan will combine this framework with both risk analysis plus proper resource prioritization on a regular basis. The three elements are associated with a number of risks that include population and population density, credible threats among others. Although they are entitled to risks at one time or the other, we see that they can be used as a tool expanded for regional collaboration. The expanded regional collaboration has facilitated the strengthening of relationships among various participants, regional preparedness planning and operational support. It is also important to note thereafter that in the standardization of the geographic regions, the three elements will enable the country into effective working with the local government and other associates to organize preparedness, spread cost, pool resources, and therefore increase the overall return on investment (Martin & James 125).

The three can uphold any risk approach to bring flexible possibilities needed to address a wide variety of occurrences such as terrorist attacks, health emergencies, natural disasters and other major incidents. They also recognize the task of governmental and non-governmental associations, the private division, and the public in the construction and maintenance of skills.

Works Cited

Bush, George. “Homeland Security Presidential Directive / HSPD-8.” U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 17 December 2003. Web. 07 October 2011.

Obama, Barack. “Presidential Policy Directive / PPD-8: National Preparedness.” U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 30 March 2011. Web. 07 October 2011.

Sauter, Martin and James Carafano. Homeland Security: a complete guide to understanding, preventing.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishers, 2005. Print.