1) Is this statement of principles consistent with the decision made in 1998 to privatize the system of managing Internet names and addresses? What would be a less regulatory position than the one the government adopted in 1998?
2) Class, the “5 Principles”, and in fact the entire document of which they are a part, focus on electronic commerce. Is that an appropriate focus? Would it have been better for the Clinton Administration to have focused on how to improve the content available on the Internet?
3) How has the FCC functioned as an “enabler” and “promoter” for the development of “advanced telecommunications services”?
4) What types of problems might be sufficient to cause the FCC to intervene in telecommunications markets in support of its statutory obligation to “encourage the deployment on a reasonable and timely basis of advanced telecommunications capability”?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|