In your view, can we say that we have unadulterated knowledge of the “original” or historical Jesus? Or is it the case that, even from our earliest accounts of his existence, the person who is describing Jesus and his significance is already importing his or her own unique and personal concerns/interests? Cite at least two concrete examples from our primary sources to illustrate your perspective. Hint: you’ll want to go back to the first three weeks of class to answer this question
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|