On the local Scottish level there would be elimination of bureaucracies that characterizes an elaborate complex structure of government which characterizes a combined state either physically or ideologically.

Globalization and world Politics
Q1: On the local Scottish level there would be elimination of bureaucracies that characterizes an elaborate complex structure of government which characterizes a combined state either physically or ideologically. It is obvious that managing a single government unit with leaders elected in a democratic process through a universal suffrage system would be easy. On the domestic UK level, United Kingdom would have an opportunity to concentrate on developing policies that would help the country to deal with its own internal affairs. On the regional EU level, Eastern European entities would achieve harmony with each single state focusing on internal development rather than ways of ‘clipping the wings’ of other states. Finally, on the global level, there would be distribution of power among the member states and development of global norms and international law. Moreover, patterns for international trade and finance would slowly emerge.
Q2. Liberalism denotes a scenario where multiple actors are actively engaged in world politics in an increasingly globalized world. It reflects liberalism on the domestic UK level, regional EU level and on the global level. This is because there are civil societies, non governmental organizations and other interest groups within Scotland, regional level and at the global level that run activities aimed at influencing the outcome of political events including the referendum. In this context, there are key actors some of whom may be non state actors but whose relative importance and influence on a political course could be high. Liberalism entails every stakeholder being given a political space to exercise or champions what it considers to be politically correct.

Q3. (a) Individual level:
David Cameron versus Alex Salmind.
Individual level also known as the domain of psychology applies here. We can safely conclude that the two leaders, sharing similar ideologies and leadership styles may have had extensive and intensive discussions on how to mobilize support for the referendum to win in favor of ‘No’. This assumption is likely to be true because the two leaders who are of Scottish origin perhaps needed to disengage from the ‘bondage’ of colonialism. Finally, it is obvious that at an individual level, everyone desires freedom and independence from captivity of any nature.

(b). Group level
Inherent bureaucracies that come with complex government organs may have given impetus to the call for the referendum. This may have been enhanced by non- governmental organizations and other civil society groups. Policy makers may have also voiced concerns on how difficult it is to formulate country specific policies.
(c). National level
Complex government structure and nature of political system may have served to synergize the clamor for a referendum. This is because the process of coming up with policies for development may have been hindered by bureaucracies in the complex government. In addition, nationalism and patriotism may have enhanced the call for a referendum where citizens of Scotland may have wanted a sense of identity. Having a national identity may have been perceived to provide fertile grounds for developing a good structure of an economic system.

(d). Global level
Globally, there is support for independence of all countries under colonial rule. Therefore, independence of European nations was supported so as to allow for distribution of power among states. This may have also been influence by patterns of the international trade and finance.