To what extent do you agree or disagree with one of Plato, Marx or Chomskys criticisms of democracy/liberal democracy?

follows in-text and end-text referencing conventions.
– Format: Times New Roman/ Size: 12
– Includes academic sources only: books, journals, academic articles.., etc.
– Well organised clear and logical progression. Ideas are effectively linked together and flow coherently and cohesively throughout. Excellent paragraph development with clear topic/main idea in each
– Use a wide range of academically appropriate vocabulary with natural and sophisticated control of lexical features. very few (if any) errors in spelling and word formation.
– Highly competent use of grammatical features of academic texts (hedging, nominalisations, reporting verbs, etc.).Use a wide range of sentence structures with flexibility and accuracy. Very few (if any) errors in use of punctuation
– Present a thorough understanding of all main issues and wider implications. Show clarity of thought, personal insight and originality.
– Fulfil task requirements thoroughly. Present a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas.
– Include an alphabetical Harvard style referencing page.
– No plagiarism
– For every argument, have a counterargument and a rebuttal.

———–

Critical Analysis:
This criterion shows how well you have analysed the question critically. This also includes correct and appropriate application and/or understanding of theories learned in your academic modules. Good answers will provide insightful and independent discussion, and/or engage with theoretical approaches relevant to the subject, while avoiding lengthy descriptive passages.
The answer displays striking insight into the topic, creative analysis and considerable originality.

Understanding the Material:
This criterion addresses to what extent you have understood the material and, in particular, the key facts. Good answers will demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of key facts and the methodology used in the field.
The assignment shows a deep understanding of the topic, with all relevant aspects covered and clearly places the topic within its academic field

Understanding the material (definitions):
This criterion addresses to what extent you have understood the term. Good answers will demonstrate an accurate understanding of the key aspects of the term.
The definition shows a full understanding of the term, with all relevant aspects covered, and does not significantly exceed the suggested word count.

Answering the question fully/Relevance:
This criterion addresses how well you have answered the question set. Good answers will present an argument well-focussed on this question, with relevant supporting examples. Because this is considered of great importance at British universities, this criterion is given twice the weighting of the others.
An outstanding piece of work which directly answers the question set, with all material directly relevant. Overall, the answer given would be impressive at undergraduate, or perhaps even at Masters, level.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered