What safeguards would you, a business manager, recommend to prevent this type of situation in your company? Discuss.

After word began circulating that the Department of Justice (DOJ) was investigating Martha Stewart regarding the timing of the sale of her stockholdings in ImClone (a company managed by her friend and associate, Sam Waskal), the price of Martha Stewart Omnimedia, Inc. shares began to drop precipitously. Faced with falling stock prices of her company—as well as her personal reputation—-Martha Stewart (who owned approximately 63% of MSO) publicly announced that she was not involved in an insider trading scheme with respect to the ImClone sale. Shortly thereafter, the Justice Department charged Martha Stewart with securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5. The criminal charges, which carried a maximum of 10 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines, were eventually dismissed by the judge presiding at her trial.

What is your opinion in this matter? Do you think the DOJ was overreaching in its allegations of securities fraud under Sec. 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (not the underlying insider trading allegations) as a result of Martha Stewarts very public statements? The courts have stated that certain conduct is required for liability under Sec. 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, which the prosecution was unable to prove in this case. Explain why this was a successful defense for Martha Stewart. Do you agree? Was the domestic diva professing her innocence, or was she trying to influence the price of the stock of Martha Stewart Omnimedia by allegedly false and misleading statements? Can (or should) an individual who is essentially the company (like Martha Stewart) make any public statements regarding their personal investment decisions, knowing it may now be interpreted by the DOJ as having the ulterior motive to influence stock prices—and possibly lead to charges of securities fraud? What safeguards would you, a business manager, recommend to prevent this type of situation in your company? Discuss.

Here are a few articles published during the proceedings

Now, Stewarts Public Statements Are Probed

Wall Street Journal

October 10, 2002

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/398873417/1394BCB132836294E65/1?accountid=10901

Martha Stewart, Broker Indicted

Wall Street Journal

June 5, 2003

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/398856255/1394BC94E5369D9174B/1?accountid=10901

Brokers Access Led to Trouble

Wall Street Journal

June 5, 2003

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/398891264/1394BD04C1766DC3917/1?accountid=10901

Prosecutors Put Focus on Stewart Comments

Wall Street Journal

February 19, 2004

http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/pqdweb?index=2&did=547140421&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1121785698&clientId=20175

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.