How the McDonaldization of Walgreens has dehumanized it’s employees

Findings and Discussion: Details about what you found in the data, in relation to your focus and hypothesis. This should be in narrative form and will be the longest part of your paper. Here you should detail your findings: you will present the data (whether it is survey results/figures, interview responses, participant observations, or organizational document analysis) and discuss the larger themes, the relevance of the findings, and the implications of what you found. This is the section in which you will make connections between what you found (your data) and the literature you introduced in your literature review. It is important, as you make assertions about how your organization illustrates course concepts (or not), that you ground your discussion in evidence: make assertions about your organization and what (and how) it illustrates, but back up those assertions with evidence (your data). Show what you�ve based your assertions/conclusions on. Refer to your survey data to support your contention. Or refer to an interview quote for support. Or use an observation to make an assertion about your organization. In general, you must ground your assertions in evidence and discuss what that evidence shows us. This section is usually 3 1/2 to 5 pages in length.
Interpretations and Conclusions: Include new issues that occur to you as a result of your findings or maybe even suggest, on the basis of your experience, how to design future research. And come back to the paper’s larger focus, the issue, to wrap things up. This section is usually about 3/4 to a page in length.

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered