National Youth Organization

National Youth Organization

From the case study, it emerges that the organization faces severe problems in its operations. It has maintained a decentralized system that has weakened homogeneity of operations across the chapters. As a result, the programs are carried out with different results across the local chapters. Similarly, the board composition limits rapid adoption of policies by the national office. This essay seeks to outline various measures that will lay the groundwork for future developments.

The organization consists of numerous chapters. However, the board representation includes only 30 of the largest chapters. As a result, the national body has limited access to smaller, struggling chapters in its policies. This aspect of board representation needs to be altered. Additional seats may be introduced for the benefit of such chapters. Each additional seat may be used to represent the issues of several minority chapters. As a result, relatively equal representation will be achieved in the organization. This change in the board composition will enable the organization to tackle important issues such as funding and program homogeneity in the future. For instance, policies that may be rejected by wealthy chapters will be able to pass thanks to support from the small chapters.

Following an alteration of the board, the homogeneity of the organization should be developed and enforced. Firstly, the national office should develop new policies on funding. It should develop a new central pool of funds that are allocated for poor chapters. Collection of funds will still be carried out by the various chapters. However, they will be required to contribute additional funds to the national office, alongside the usual ‘membership’ dues. This will ensure that all chapters maintain relatively equal footing in the operation of programs. For example, they will be able to fund the employment of staffs.

Similarly, wealthy chapters will face a decrease in their independence from the national office policies hence homogeneity. Secondly, the national office should maintain sole control over the programs carried out. Local chapters should be encouraged to adhere to the set standards through systems of rewards and sanctions. Non-performing programs should not receive funding while the successful ones should be rewarded (Lewis, 2001). These policies will also ensure that the organization maintains its decentralized traditions while ensuring success in the future, through homogeneity.


 Lewis, D. J. 2001. The management of non-governmental development organizations. London: Routledge.


Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.